|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
267 back of 216 268 217
MEASURE FOR p. 29 BIT BOOK. RAMO RIMPETTO MOCANIGO
m.(soffit of brickwork) to correspondent point on opposite Doors. Close to this house, at the end of a small closed alley
side of arch) 3 " 8 this Ramo Rimpetto Mocenzio is the exquisite door
n (or n in fig 3) to similar opposite point 3 " 5 sketched generally at p 27 bit book. It is built into
m-n2 breadth of archivolt 0 " 6 the wall, and filled up but without injury or less
m-y pure brickwork exclusive of dentil and except only of the jamb part of its surrounding square
mouldings 0 " 3 architrave. This is in red Verona and about 8 inches
c C a vide note opposite (x) 3 " 1 wide as far as it is exposed; precisely in principle
p C x like the Sta Margheretta one: all that is visible of the
o section is at fig 1 p 29 1 being built up at the point b.
q C 3 " 7 On p 29 is a careful drawing of the angle of this archi-
r C x trave and the head of the door, and in section of fig 1
o the line a2 is the level of the recessed wall above a
C to ground 8 " 0 on p 29, while the stone panel of shield is advanced
a b circa 0 " 8 to the front level a. Fig 2 is section r r2 on p 29
x y vertical 2 "11 and fig 3 its very singular lower moulding larger.
z z 0 " 2 Now y in p 29 being inner edge of dentil and x the
angle on outer edge of flat brickwork observe that
x x should be exactly above y and not the inner edge of
o The points r and p are the r and p of p 28 a most the upright bricks (as l[h]ooks natural at first)
careful drawing of the top of the door:not to be confused
with the rs of p 29. z z is of course in stone, it is (x) Note also on measure cC that C is of course the
our off (by the new buildings I think) abruptly above x it usual centre of arch, on the red Verona lintel, but
is seen better on p 28 where its section is at fig 1 the point of the shield ought not to touch this - nor
The coa[s]t of arms square inside arch is about 1 " 9 or even to touch its dentil nor the latter the lintel but
1 " 10 wide including the dentils. should be as on p 30 fig 4 The measure of C was unneces-
sary but is neatly confirmatory of nn2.
|
|
|
|
|
|
[Version 0.05: May 2008]